Die mächtigste Formel des Universums
Bis heute konnte noch keine Formel gefunden werden, die unser Universum in seiner Physik und Gesetzmäßigkeiten vollständig beschreiben kann. Denn unsere größten beiden Theorien, die Allgemeine Relativitätstheorie und die Quantentheorie, passen nach wie vor nicht zusammen. Aber jetzt will der Forscher Stephen Wolfram einen Weg gefunden haben, wie wir den genetischen Code unseres Universums entschlüsseln können. Kann das stimmen? Patreon: http://patreon.com/DoktorWhatson DoktorWhatson.tv: http://www.doktorwhatson.tv Instagram: http://instagram.com/DoktorWhatson Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/DoktorWhatson Discord: http://discord.me/DoktorWhatson Musik von NOVAH: https://www.youtube.com/user/NovahMedia Outro-Song: https://spoti.fi/2Wbh1Nw Weitere Musik von https://artlist.io/ Quellen: 1 – Interview Prof. Hermann Nicolai 2 – Hossenfelder, S. (2018). Lost in Math: How Beauty Leads Physics Astray. Basic Books, New York. | Interview Prof. Hermann Nicolai | https://www.forbes.com/sites/startswithabang/2020/05/13/3-simple-reasons-why-wolframs-new-fundamental-theory-is-not-yet-science/ 3 – https://www.forbes.com/sites/startswithabang/2020/05/13/3-simple-reasons-why-wolframs-new-fundamental-theory-is-not-yet-science/ 4 – https://www.forbes.com/sites/startswithabang/2020/05/13/3-simple-reasons-why-wolframs-new-fundamental-theory-is-not-yet-science/ 5 – https://www.forbes.com/sites/startswithabang/2020/05/13/3-simple-reasons-why-wolframs-new-fundamental-theory-is-not-yet-science/ 6 – https://www.forbes.com/sites/startswithabang/2020/05/13/3-simple-reasons-why-wolframs-new-fundamental-theory-is-not-yet-science/ 7 – https://www.mpp.mpg.de/forschung/aufbau-der-materie/stringtheorie/ 8 – https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/physicists-criticize-stephen-wolframs-theory-of-everything/ 9 – https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/physicists-criticize-stephen-wolframs-theory-of-everything/ 10 – https://www.wired.com/story/stephen-wolfram-invites-you-to-solve-physics/ 11 – https://www.wolframphysics.org/technical-introduction/potential-relation-to-physics/basic-concepts/#p-405 12 – https://www.wired.com/story/stephen-wolfram-invites-you-to-solve-physics/ 13 – https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-27149-7_2 14 – https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/physicists-criticize-stephen-wolframs-theory-of-everything/ | https://www.wired.com/story/stephen-wolfram-invites-you-to-solve-physics/ 15 – https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-27149-7_2 | https://interestingengineering.com/the-theory-of-everything-by-wolfram-gets-criticized-by-physicists 16 – https://www.spektrum.de/lexikon/physik/theory-of-everything/14428 17 – https://www.wired.com/story/stephen-wolfram-invites-you-to-solve-physics/ 18 – https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/physicists-criticize-stephen-wolframs-theory-of-everything/ 19 – https://www.wired.com/story/stephen-wolfram-invites-you-to-solve-physics/ 20 – https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/physicists-criticize-stephen-wolframs-theory-of-everything/ 21 – https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/physicists-criticize-stephen-wolframs-theory-of-everything/ 22 – https://www.wired.com/story/stephen-wolfram-invites-you-to-solve-physics/ 23 – https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/physicists-criticize-stephen-wolframs-theory-of-everything/ 24 – https://www.forbes.com/sites/startswithabang/2020/05/13/3-simple-reasons-why-wolframs-new-fundamental-theory-is-not-yet-science/ 25 – https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/physicists-criticize-stephen-wolframs-theory-of-everything/ 26 – https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-27149-7_2